Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1699

reference
93-tree-1
name
1699
tree-preservation-order

undefined

93-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.007240 50.863320)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.007098 50.863305,-1.007105 50.863333,-1.007124 50.863358,-1.007155 50.863378,-1.007195 50.863391,-1.007238 50.863396,-1.007282 50.863392,-1.007322 50.863380,-1.007354 50.863360,-1.007375 50.863335,-1.007382 50.863307,-1.007376 50.863279,-1.007356 50.863254,-1.007325 50.863234,-1.007286 50.863221,-1.007242 50.863216,-1.007198 50.863220,-1.007158 50.863233,-1.007126 50.863252,-1.007106 50.863277,-1.007098 50.863305)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL